Baseball and the World Series: Context and Contests

Bob Bates —


Two months after the first “World’s Series,” Wilbur and Orville Wright made their first flight at Kitty Hawk. Baseball’s only rivals for popularity among Americans were horse racing and boxing. Teddy Roosevelt was president. Silent films were all the rage. In nine years the unsinkable Titanic would plunge to the depths of the Atlantic. U.S. entry into The “War to End All Wars” was nearly 14 years into the future. Women would not gain the right to vote for another 17 years. The first coverage of the Series by radio would not occur until 1921. In two dozen years “talkie” movies would debut. The tragic fiery crash of the airship Hindenburg would be a third of a century away.

Cy_Young_1_MLB_HOF

Cy Young

It was October of 1903 when the immortal Cy Young threw the first ever pitch of what would become The Fall Classic, which was won by Young’s Boston Americans. (Young won 511 games over a 22 year career.) Teams would travel to road trip games by train for over a half-century. Television coverage of a Series games would debut in 44 years (black and white, of course; the NBC peacock color cast would air eight years later). All these World Series games were daytime affairs; the first night game broadening the public’s viewing opportunity would not take place for a full two-thirds of a century.

Consider further some history prior to the initial World Series. Abraham Lincoln was still an Illinois lawyer and congressman when “base-ball” playing caught the popular imagination of mid-19th century America. Shortly after the Civil War, communities across the land took great pride in their local teams, and competitive leagues mushroomed. Gambling on games added excitement and became commonplace, boosting competitive rivalries.

By 1871 the professionalization of base-ball further garnered national attention, and anchored itself in America’s growing capitalistic system. Players, now recognizing their revenue value to team owners and a team’s fan base, began to hire out their services to the highest bidder. This quickly led to “player raids” by well-heeled club owners and promoters, which in turn resulted in owners creating the infamous Reserve Clause in 1879, prohibiting players from “team jumping.” (Such dictatorial powers would remain dominant for nearly a century, until 1976’s arbitration ruling declaring “free agency,” which permitted players to negotiate with any team for more lucrative contracts.)

Additionally, some chintzy owners, seeking to pad their coffers, egregiously charged players for uniforms, laundering, and boarding fees on the road, and further reduced their operating expenses through a no play-no pay clause. Such penurious practices would, over the next four decades, result in widespread players’ disgruntlement and festering rebellious countering tactics, culminating in the 1919 World Series “Black Sox scandal,” when seven Chicago White Sox conspired with big-time gamblers to intentionally lose the Series. The premier base-ball league from 1876 to 1900 was the National League (NL). But when the NL cut back from twelve to eight teams to reduce operating costs and increase profits by dropping financially struggling clubs in 1899, this opened the door for an enterprising rival league. Byron “Ban” Johnson organized the new eight-team American League (AL), snatching up players from disbanded teams and luring away prominent NL players who were more than willing to defy the Reserve Clause and sign on for more money in the AL.

Who Played, Who Didn’t

Following the Civil War, there were some notable professional “colored” players by the 1870s. However, during the mid-1880s, overtly racist whites—in particular Adrian “Cap” Anson, who played and managed over three decades—effectively established an unspoken (wink wink, nod nod), unwritten “gentlemen’s agreement” that no black players would be allowed in organized baseball. This exclusion would hold until the signing of Jackie Robinson by Brooklyn Dodger general manager Branch Rickey six decades later.

jimthorpe

Jim Thorpe

American Indians were allowed into the major league level, including two future Hall of Famers: Charles Albert “Chief” Bender (played from 1903-17 and in five World Series) and Zack Wheat (1909-27 and two World Series). The era’s greatest all-around athlete and famous Olympian, Jim Thorpe (1913-19 and in one World Series), plus many other Native Americans of lesser notability also earned their way onto major league rosters.

Prior to 1947’s breaking of the “color barrier,” about 20 light-skinned Cubans played, the most prominent being Adolfo “The Pride of Havana” Luque (1914-35 and two World Series). Dark-skinned Cubans were banned—as both they and U.S. blacks carried the stigma of descending from the African slave trade. During World War II, with rosters depleted by players in the service, an influx of about 50 Latin Americans brought further minority presence to the majors.

s-l300

Satchel Paige (left) and Larry Doby (right)

As a largely overlooked historical footnote, “renegade” baseball man Bill Veeck made a behind-the-scenes bid in 1943 to purchase the bankrupt Philadelphia NL franchise, surreptitiously preparing to sign accomplished Negro League players to stock the Phillies. As soon as the NL owners figured out what was up, they precipitously rejected Veeck’s bid. In 1947, however, Veeck purchased the AL Cleveland franchise and began signing black players, most notably future Hall of Famers Larry Doby and the legendary Satchel Paige. In 1948 the Indians became World Champions, getting vital contributions from both Doby and Paige.

In 1920 Rube Foster had successfully launched the Negro National League, providing opportunities for black ballplayers to participate at a high level and excel. Other major black leagues would follow over the next four decades. These leagues were widely covered by numerous black newspapers, and would play alternative Championship Series themselves, through 1949.

Baseball Rituals and Innovations

The first president to throw out the ceremonial pitch to open a World Series was Woodrow Wilson in 1915. Five years previously, corpulent president William Howard Taft—all very visible 340 pounds of him—arose from his cramped stadium seat in the middle of the 7th inning to stretch his massive frame. The attentive crowd, showing deference to the nation’s lofty dignitary, also rose from their seats. Thus the tradition of the “7th inning stretch” was popularized.

caray-1

Harry Caray

Another baseball tradition made its first appearance in a World Series in 1934 when the St. Louis Cardinals band played “Take Me Out to the Ball Game.” Iconic broadcaster Harry Caray later popularized it as a sacramental part of the 7th inning stretch in 1971 when he enthusiastically belted it out from the booth over the public address system at Chicago’s southside Comiskey Park.

A new tradition was born in 1932 when the World Series-winning New York Yankees were presented with commemorative championship rings. The 1977 Yankees enhanced this now long-established custom by adorning their rings with a dozen diamonds. The finally-over-the-top Chicago Cubs last year—after a 107-year World Championship drought—extravagantly designed their rings with 214 diamonds.

As to the baseball diamond itself, a series of modifications gradually altered the game. Initially, in 1876, the distance from the pitcher’s mound to home plate was 45 feet. In 1882 the distance was extended to 50 feet, and in 1893 it was standardized permanently at 60 feet 6 inches. Until 1884, all pitches were required by rule to be thrown underhand or sidearm. Also standardized in 1888 and ’89 were balls and strikes, at four and three (previously as high as nine and four). During this era, catchers wore torso padding and crude masks, but did not wear shin guards until 1907.

In 1900 home plate was changed from a 12″ square to a 17″-wide five-sided design. The height of the pitcher’s mound was regulated at “no more than 15 inches” in 1903. After pitching overwhelmingly dominated hitting during the 1968 season, it was reduced to its current 10 inches. In 1920, after Cleveland’s Ray Chapman died from being hit in the head by a smudged and darkened baseball thrown by a spitball pitcher, clean baseballs were mandated and the spitball was by rule prohibited. Numbers on the backs of uniform jerseys were introduced in 1929. As of 1949, to protect outfielders from injuries sustained from crashing into walls (then unpadded), dirt warning tracks were made mandatory. More recent safety rules were imposed in 2014 and 2016, designed to eliminate baserunner-fielder collisions at home plate and second base.

In 1934 the official ball was standardized, uniformly constructed with a cushion cork center, two wrappings of yarn, a rubber cement coating, two more yarn wrappings, and a horsehide cover tightly wrapped with 108 paired stitchings. As of 1974, batters could no longer “hit the ol’ horsehide,” as the covering changed to cowhide. Currently, 60-80 fresh baseballs are typically put into play during the course of a game; the Rawlings facility in Costa Rica supplies Major League Baseball with about two million baseballs per season.

World Series Teams, Players, and Highlights across the Decades

john-mcgraw-connie-mack-191

John McGraw (left) and Connie Mack (right)

The initial three decades of professional baseball often featured on-the-field aggression, clever tactics, and when circumstances called for it, outright cheating. Fittingly, in 1905 two legendary managers notorious for trying every conceivable cerebral or devious stratagem necessary to win a game met in the first seven-game Series. Cornelius Alexander McGilicuddy, aka Connie Mack (“The Tall Tactician”), led his gritty Philadelphia Athletics against John Joseph McGraw (“The Little Napoleon”) and his brash New York Giants. Imposing a contrasting tone, however, was Giants phenomenal pitcher Christy (“Big Six”) Mathewson, whose sterling character and gentlemanly demeanor made him the All-American hero across the land. Matty dominated the A’s, twirling three shutouts, allowing just 14 hits and a walk while striking out 18 in 27 superlative innings.

From 1907-09, barely 20 years of age, Tyrus Raymond Cobb (“The Georgia Peach”) led his Detroit Tigers into consecutive World Series—all three of which they lost. Over 17 games Cobb hit just .262 and his flashing spikes went dull, as the all-time stolen base leader for three-quarters of a century was held to only four swiped bags. In his 24-year career, from April through September, Cobb compiled the all-time best batting average (BA) of .367, including a phenomenal dozen batting crowns, but October proved his downfall.

At age 20 in 1916, then again in 1918, a Boston lefty pitcher by the name of George Herman Ruth helped his Red Sox team to two World Championships by chalking up three wins, compiling an 0.87 earned run average (ERA) and hurling a World Series streak of 29-2/3 scoreless innings, a record that would stand for 44 years.

Baseball’s darkest atmosphere surrounded the infamous 1919 World Series “Black Sox scandal.” The combination of unsavory widespread gambling on games plus owners’ demeaningly low salaries was a recipe-in-waiting for major corruption to occur. Seething at Chicago penurious owner Charles (“Cheap Charlie”) Comiskey, seven White Sox players accepted bribes to throw the Series. It would take a couple years for public trust and interest in baseball to resume, but thanks to the exploits of now-Yankee Babe Ruth in 1920 and ’21, fans everywhere were re-attracted to the game, re-confirming it as the unchallenged American Pastime.

In every Series it seems something freaky is bound to occur. In 1920, two one-time-only World Series aberrations happened within three innings. In the fifth, Brooklyn’s Clarence Mitchell smoked a line drive up the middle with two baserunners on the move at the crack of the bat. Cleveland second-baseman Bill Wambsganss made a leaping backhand snare of the shot, niftily stepped on the bag at second, and reached out to tag the runner coming in from first base—completing an unassisted triple play! Some 20 minutes later, the luckless Mitchell grounded into a double play; on just two swings of the bat, he had accounted for five outs!

BABE'S LAST HOMERS

Babe Ruth

The 1923 World Series opened with a celebratory crowd of 60,000 in newly constructed Yankee Stadium, with the cross-town Giants providing the competition. The Bronx Bombers would prevail in six games, with Babe Ruth clouting three homers, but the most exciting drama transpired in game one with the first home run ever hit in Yankee Stadium. And “in” is the key word! Thirty-four year-old Casey Stengel, considered to be a grizzled, aging veteran by then, wildly galloped around the bases—losing a shoe in the process—on his drive to deep left center field (known as “death valley”) for an inside-the-park home run, giving the Giants the win. Legendary sportswriter Damon Runyon described the electrifying scene thusly: “Mouth wide open, breath whistling, arms flying, warped legs barely holding out as Stengel circumnavigated the bags and fell sprawling all spread out over the plate, gasping furiously!” Yankee Stadium would become known as “The House that Ruth built,” but on this World Series-christening day, it was Ol’ Case who brought down the house with his heroic dash!

Of the five World Series in 1923, ’26-28, and ’32, the powerful Yankees would win it all four times. Ruth (“The Bambino,” “The Sultan of Swat”) would smash 14 home runs in 21 games, putting a national exclamation point to his revolutionizing baseball with the long ball. Always loving the spotlight, The Babe in ’32 at Wrigley Field  with Chicago fans and players hurling abusive language and gestures his way would—as legend has it— famously “call his shot” by pointing toward the center field wall and then on the next pitch pulverizing the horsehide spheroid far beyond it!

dean.cut

Dizzy Dean (left) and Daffy Dean (right)

In 1931 the Series was a hard-fought affair between St. Louis Cardinals and Philadelphia, with the Athletics boasting five players who would be inducted into the Hall of Fame. Yet, the scrappy Cardinals would prevail four games to three. Dubbed the “Gashouse Gang” because of their always potentially-explosive playing style, leading the charge was 5′ 8″ John Leonard Roosevelt (“Pepper,” “The Wild Hoss of the Osage”) Martin. Pepper rapped out a dozen hits, with five runs batted in (RBI), and his daring base running produced 5 stolen bases and 5 runs scored. The 1934 edition of the Gas House Gang would also triumph behind the pitching tandem of the Dean brothers, Jay Hanna (“Dizzy”) and Paul Dee (“Daffy”), each with two complete game wins. These colorful Cardinals featured an additional array of nicknames, including “Ducky,” “Dazzy,” “Chick,” “Spud,” “Tex,” “Wild Bill,” “Ripper,” “The Fordham Flash,” “Leo the Lip,” and the aforementioned “Pepper.”

The 1936 through ’39 Yankees were just too skilled and deep to match up with, copping four consecutive World Championships with a combined 16 wins against only 3 losses. Future Hall of Famers were Lou Gehrig, Bill Dickey, Tony Lazzeri, Red Ruffing, Lefty Gomez, and a youthful Joe DiMaggio.

By 1942, World War II had depleted major league player talent through enlistments and the draft. By war’s end, in 1946, the nation was hungry for peacetime diversions from four long years of sacrifices in the European and Pacific theaters and on the home front.

world_series_mays

Willie Mays

The post-war era Fall Classics presented America with what is termed the Golden Age of baseball. Fans jammed stadiums and folks at home tuned in by the millions to radio and TV baseball coverage. From 1946-59, each World Series featured magnificent action. The Yankees dynasty appeared in 10 Series, winning eight. Bill Veeck’s Indians, debuting Larry Doby and the ageless Satchel Paige, won in ’48. The ’54 Giants swept the AL-record winning Indians (111-43) and showcased perhaps the all-time clutch over-the-shoulder catch 450-feet in deepest center field by Willie Mays, and an equally crucial game-winning pop just clearing the short 260-foot right field wall down the line by James Lamar (“Dusty”) Rhodes. In 1955, at long last “wait til next year” arrived, as the Brooklyn Dodgers captured a tension-filled battle with the Yanks. In decisive game seven, Cuban Edmundo (“Sandy”) Amoros made a breathtaking running catch deep in the left field corner, then whirled and threw to second base for a double play, killing a budding Yankee rally; and young lefty Johnny Podres’s artfully threw two complete game wins, including a shutout to clinch it.

larsen-50th-baseball

Don Larsen

The very next year, in game five at Yankee Stadium, a feat perhaps never to be duplicated blazed across the headlines: Larsen Throws Perfect Game!—as the Yankees’ Don Larsen pitched the only no hit, no run, no baserunners game ever in World Series history.

And, who then alive-and-breathing in 1957 Wisconsin does not still hold dear to heart their beloved Milwaukee Braves beating the hated Yankees on crafty Lew Burdette’s three complete game wins, including two shutouts, and Henry Aaron’s 3 home runs, 7 RBI, and .393 Series BA! But the Bronx Bombers would gain revenge over the Braves in ’58, rebounding from a 3-games-to-1 deficit to win thanks to the dominant pitching of Big Bob Turley

The Dodgers had rudely packed up and deserted Brooklyn after the 1957 season for greener (read cash, and lots of it!) pastures in Los Angeles. The West Coast Dodgers filled the LA Coliseum in game five of the ’59 Series with an all-time record crowd of 92,706, and brought the World Championship to the Pacific time zone for the first time. LA’s star was relief pitcher Larry Sherry, who racked up 2 wins, 2 saves, and a superlative 0.71 ERA.

Transitions Into and Changes Beyond the 1960s

For just shy of the entire first half of the 20th century, the only times fans could actually watch games in action was when they occupied seats in stadiums. Theater Movietone film clips offered brief visual snippets, but otherwise fans were reliant on newspaper coverage for game descriptions, details, and photos. In the 1920s radio broadcasts supplemented this, permitting fans to intently follow the action on the field play-by-play, drawing on fans’ imaginations to create mental pictures. Finally, with post-war TV coverage, game action reached into living rooms across the nation.

Koufax Drysdale

Sandy Koufax (left) and Don Drysdale (right)

In the 1960s, memorable moments were plentiful. Though the mighty Yankees in ’60 had outscored Pittsburgh 46-17 through six games, Pirate Bill Mazeroski’s dramatic bottom of the ninth walk-off homer made champions of the Pirates. In ’63 Johnny Podres, Don Drysdale, and Sandy Koufax totally shut down the ’61 and ’62 Series-winning Yankees, holding the powerful New Yorkers to a paltry .167 BA and only four total runs in four consecutive losses. Superlative pitching continued to dominate in ’64 (Cardinals’ Bob Gibson), ’65 (Koufax), ’66 (the entire Orioles staff handcuffing the Dodgers, allowing LA only two runs and a miniscule .142 BA in a four-game sweep). Bob Gibson dominated again in ’67 with three wins over the Red Sox; Detroit turned the tables on the Cards in ’68, as Mickey Lolich notched three wins for the Tigers. The Miracle Mets in ’69 surprised the baseball world with a four-game upset of a talent-loaded Orioles team.

Reggie_Jackson_October_1973.jpeg

Reggie Jackson

The 1970s featured the powerhouse Oakland A’s (three Championships) and Cincinnati Big Red Machine (four Series appearances and two Championships). But the most amazing-ever feat was Reggie Jackson’s four home runs on four consecutive swings in ’77!

Free Agency in 1976 forever altered baseball. Clubs could remedy particular weaknesses by tapping available free agents, and talent became more equally distributed among more teams. Between ’76 and ’95, no fewer than 15 different teams would win World Championships. Revenue sharing in 1996 also contributed to more competitive parity among clubs, denting the previous big-spending dominance of the richer franchises. From ’96 to 2016, 12 different teams have won it all.

In view of this, since the 1980s there has generally been more balance across baseball. Individual heroics have tended to grab the spotlight, rather than great teams. Names that are etched in the memories of most baseball fans in this period include Tug McGraw, Brooks Robinson, Kirk Gibson (full-throttle with the Tigers and hurting and hobbling with the Dodgers), Jack Morris (with the Tigers and Twins), Bret Saberhagen, Bill Buckner, Kirby Puckett, Orel Hershiser, Dave Stewart, Joe Carter, Paul Molitor, Derek Jeter, Mariano Rivera, Randy Johnson, Pablo (“The Panda”) Sandoval, David (“Big Papi”) Ortiz , and Madison Bumgarner.

So much history! So many memorable moments! Here in 2017’s version of the Fall Classic, as you perhaps kick back with a cold brewski and munchies at hand, keep in the forefront of your mind some baseball wisdom passed along from wily old veterans of the game: Ignore the hype; the game happens on the field. Every pitch must have a purpose; each at bat must have an objective. Every routine play must be made. Expect the unexpected. There are no guarantees. And an obvious-but-too-often-missed tip: Right before the pitch, watch the catcher set-up! 

So, enjoy the action, wonder at the skills, appreciate the efforts, and celebrate greatness. The World Series is among the most exciting entertainment events you can behold. After all, as Yogi Berra said, “You can observe a lot by watching.”

Selected Sources

The American League, Gallery Books (1986).

The Baseball Encyclopedia, Macmillan (1988).

The Baseball Encyclopedia, Sterling (2006).

Baseball Extra: A Newspaper History of the Glorious Game from Its Beginnings to the Present, Eric C. Caren Collection/Castle Books (2000).

Donald Honig, The World Series: An Illustrated History from 1903 to the Present, Random House Value (1986).

Smithsonian Baseball: Inside the World Series Finest Private Collections, Stephen Wong/Smithsonian Books (2005).

The World Series: An Illustrated Encyclopedia of the Fall Classic, Black Dog & Leventhal  (2001).

 

 

 

About Bob Bates (10 Articles)
Former shelf-stocker, monkey-tester, plant worker, English teacher, community youth worker, and disability adjudicator. In retirement, thoroughly enjoying celebrating life and learning. Loves reading a broad variety of nonfiction, dancing with his wife Judy, playing tennis, baseball, cooking/baking, grunt gardening, leaving a miniscule carbon footprint, sunny days.

15 Comments on Baseball and the World Series: Context and Contests

  1. Annalie Winters // October 17, 2017 at 2:49 pm // Reply

    Very enjoyable WS overview – and I didn’t think Harry Caray was ever that young!:-)

    Like

  2. Harry would likely say, ‘Whaddaya mean?!” Born in 1914 & an orphan by age 7, Harry grew up in a hardscrabble St. Louis neighborhood. As a young man he was strikingly handsome, & his openly friendly personality served him well in making contacts with people established in the broadcasting establishment. He started in Joliet, moved up to Kalamazoo & Battle Creek and then to the bigtime in St. Louis prior to finally arriving in Chicago with first the Sox & then the Cubs. Everywhere he went he was appreciated as a ‘man of the people,’ the common fans. He originated “Holy Cow!,” his trademark home run call of “It might be…it could be…it IS!,” & exhuberently leading “Take Me Out to the Ball game.” For these & many other reasons he was very much missed in ’98 and still is.

    Like

  3. Mark Richardson // October 20, 2017 at 2:07 pm // Reply

    Nice piece, Bob. Regarding President Taft and the 7th inning stretch, baseball historian Michael Aubrecht writes, “A manuscript dated 1869 was discovered. In it Harry Wright of the Cincinnati Red Stockings describes a break in play. He wrote, ‘The spectators all arise between halves of the seventh inning, extend their legs and arms, and sometimes walk about. In doing so they enjoy the relief afforded by relaxation from a long posture upon hard benches.'” So the 7th inning stretch was part of baseball at least 41 years before the Taft story became famous.

    Like

  4. Good to hear from you, Mark. Your being the most knowledgeable baseball fan I know, I value your comments. As you are aware, legend & lore are part of baseball history, & sometimes a popularized conception develops into “mythical reality.” I suspect such is the case with president Taft. Note the way I phrased it: “tradition…was popularized.” So, let’s give Harry Wright’s Red Stockings their due for originality. Either the 7th inning stretch was born on the banks of the Ohio River, or fans arose from their seats to see if their horses & wagons were still there! As you know, Wright’s Reds were undefeated in 1869, often winning by big double-digit margins. So maybe, just maybe the fans in the stands were just getting up to boogie home to the missus so as not to be late for supper!
    I look forward to your next piece, Mark; I love your baseball stuff.

    Like

  5. Perhaps Bob and Mark could clarify this issue as well: There seems to be some disagreement as to how many players were implicated in the Black Sox scandal. I always heard that there were eight, as in John Sayles’s film “Eight Men Out,” but Bob writes that there were seven.

    Like

  6. Go for it, Mark. It gets pretty complex, so terms to be aware of in the context of the corruption in the 1919 Series include, besides “implicated,” aware of bribery, entered into collusion & accepted bribes, took perverse pleasure in accepting money, played on the field in ways that showed intentions of losing, & maybe even laughed all the way to the bank in the off-season. Any others you think should be included please do, Mark.

    Like

  7. Mark Richardson // October 24, 2017 at 11:35 am // Reply

    LOL. No matter how many times I read the Wright quote, or what mood I’m in when I read it, I cannot find a way to read into it that he was trying to make the point that the people were actually getting up to leave after the seventh inning. I’m quite sure, in fact, that if this were the intent of his statement, he would have just said it. Sorry, but leaving the game is just NOT what Harry was talking about.

    Like

  8. Mark Richardson // October 24, 2017 at 12:03 pm // Reply

    As regards the Black Sox scandal, it seems to me that we need not try and confuse the issue with any consideration of abstract ideas of what these terms all mean or imply. It seems to me enough to simply ask what occurred and who was involved. Now, there are really only two conclusions that result. The first is that all eight players were innocent, that there was no fix at all. After all, a jury acquitted all eight of any wrongdoing. And Chick Gandil, who has always been regarded as the ringleader of the players, the guy who contacted and was contacted by the gamblers, lived well into his eighties and insisted to his dying day that he had never taken any money to fix anything, and that there never even was a fix. This conclusion, though, seems quite erroneous in light of certain evidence of which we are all aware, for instance Eddie Cicotte’s statement to the press that “We were crooked,” and Joe Jackson’s admission that he had accepted $5,000.00 to lay down during the Series. The second conclusion, and the only one that really answers, for me, is that the Commissioner of baseball, Judge Landis, banned all eight players and none has ever been reinstated, despite the issue having been revisited be every Commissioner since Landis. He felt that all eight were guilty, albeit of different offenses. He did concede that Buck Weaver had not participated in the fix, but that he had been aware of it, that the others had discussed it with him in an effort to get him to join them, and that he never said a word to either his manager, Kid Gleason, or the team owner, Charles Comiskey, therefore making him just as complicit as the seven players who were actually actively involved in the fix. Since Major League Baseball has looked at each of these eight individuals over and over again and has never seen fit to alter Judge Landis’ original judgement against all eight, I just can not see any way that we can reduce the number from eight to seven. All eight were banned from baseball forever, and baseball still officially bans all eight…so eight it is.

    Like

    • Mark Richardson // October 24, 2017 at 12:51 pm // Reply

      Many people have said that Joe Jackson should be exonerated because he played well, racking up the highest average in the Series, or that Fred McMullen should be set aside as a conspirator because he was a backup who didn’t play so he was not active in playing to fix the games. But this overlooks the fact that, even if they did no harm to their team with bad play during the series, they were at least as guilty as Weaver of keeping what they knew to themselves, thus making them part of the conspiracy. We can all hold our own opinions as to how many we feel were mistreated by baseball, but that’s all they are–our personal opinions. ALL that matters is that baseball said all eight were complicit, and that makes the accurate number eight, not seven.

      Like

  9. Thanks for your extended responses, Mark. Before going into the 1919 Series, a follow-up on 1869: I was just kidding with the comment on keeping the missus happy by coming home to supper instead of hanging around the ballpark with the boys.

    As to any historical event, I always want to know what the context surrounding it was. Details can be crucial in both arriving at justice & avoiding injustice. From what I’ve encountered re the Black Sox scandal, the ringleader was Chick Gandil, who handled the encounters with gamblers & distributed the payoffs. Clearly, from multiple perspectives, Gandil, Risberg, Cicotte, & Williams were willing & active participants; Felsch & McMullen to a lesser extent. Jackson was manipulated, though opted in. Only hearsay from 2nd & 3rd sources connect Weaver; there is no evidence he agreed to join in, he (alone) never received any money, & his play over all 8 games was stellar. Yes, he was aware of the bribes & was friends with some of these teammates, but no one ever stated he had joined in with the “fix.” The context of the times in baseball was that what happened both off & on the field with teammates stayed among them. No, the fact that Weaver did not report what he heard does not exonerate him from involvement, but it was peripheral and, as all players knew, whether they opted in or stayed out the fix was going to take place anyway; high stakes had already been set into motion. Both Weaver & Jackson, by all accounts, played their individual best despite seeing some “funny things” going on around them.

    Author of “Eight Men Out” Eliot Asinof himself stated, “Weaver was a total innocent. The only thing he did wrong was not to rat on his buddies. He never took a dime.” Commissioner Landis’ heavy-handed autocratic manner of pronouncing all 8 guilty & banning them was only partial justice; it was overkill to Jackson & injustice to Weaver. SABR researcher & author of the 1992 book “The Ginger Kid: The Buck Weaver Story,” Irving M. Stein, covers Weaver’s life in his informative 327-page book, & he along with many other baseball historians concludes his noninvolvement. Also, the stenographic report of the grand jury testimony of Jackson on Sept. 28, 1920 (E.A. Eulass & Co. Court Reporters), shows no indication of Jackson ever being aware of any intent to participate by Weaver. So, I stand by my piece citing “seven White Sox players accepted bribes.” I think this is as accurate a conclusion attainable when taking into account as much evidence as is available. Justice is best served when injustices are revisited. Buck Weaver got a raw deal.

    Like

  10. Mark Richardson // October 24, 2017 at 7:52 pm // Reply

    Well, Bob, I appreciate your point of view, but I think I still disagree with it. Let’s look at this from a little different perspective. Let’s say there’s a guy, a military veteran, who has grown disgruntled with the American government. Let’s call him–oh, I don’t know…let’s call him McVeigh, Tim McVeigh. Let’s say that he has a buddy, an equally disgruntled ex-military guy. We’ll call him Terry Nichols. Together they decide that the best way they can show that unjust old government how they feel about it is to get an old truck, fill it with treated fertilizer that will make just a stellar bomb, and park it in front of the Murrah federal building in Oklahoma City. They bring in their old pal, a guy we’ll call Michael Fortier, but Fortier is kind of cold to the idea. So Michael knows all about the plans that Tim and Terry have hatched, but, gee, they’re his pals and he doesn’t want to rat them out……See where I’m going with this?

    Like

  11. Mark Richardson // October 24, 2017 at 7:58 pm // Reply

    LOL. OK, I’ll concede that I went a little over the top with this, and I’ll admit that Fortier, while found guilty and punished, was not punished as severely as the other two, while Weaver did suffer the same punishment as those who were actually involved in the fix…but I was having fun with it.

    Like

  12. Mark Richardson // October 25, 2017 at 8:27 am // Reply

    I also have to wonder, Bob, why you are so quick to assume that, as you write, “the fix was going to take place anyway.” I am quite sure that this is just no so. There was a signal to the gamblers that was to be given as the Series began. Cicotte was to hit the first batter if the fix was on. Not knowing for sure how it was going to go with the players, the gamblers bet very lightly on that first game. After the first game, which indeed began with the first batter being hit by a pitch, the gamblers felt assured that all their plans were set, and they bet heavily on game two. Now, if Weaver had gone to either Gleason or Comiskey and revealed what he knew, I for one am quite sure that the players involved would have faced a stern rebuke, the first batter would NOT have been hit, and the whole fix would have been called off. This is, of course, speculation, but the truth is, if Weaver had spoken up before the Series began, I absolutely believe that this would have been the case.

    Like

  13. Mark Richardson // October 26, 2017 at 7:36 am // Reply

    Bob, as I re-read my comments I realize that they have a harsher sound to them than I intended. I apologize for this. I liked your piece very much, and if I disagree with a small thing here or there, that’s all it is–a small difference of opinion. Your article is sound, and it is fun. It is thought-provoking and well done, and I enjoyed it a lot.

    Like

  14. No need for concern on your part, Mark. The whole 1919 Series—lead-up, action on the field, actions off the field, & aftermath—has, to this day, a lot of murkiness to it. In life & history whenever hard facts are not totally clear, interpretations are in order.

    Just a couple clarifications: 1) I am not being quick to conclude that the fix was in, no matter how Jackson or Weaver chose to handle what they knew. 2) In all practicality at the time, basically whatever Weaver would have said to Gleason or Comiskey likely would have been inconsequential.

    Regarding #1, volumes could be—& have been—written. Stein, among other researchers/authors, has to a great extent filled in the context of the times, the nefarious influences existing prior to & during the Series, & the motivations of involved parties. You are likely aware of many if not most of these factors, Mark. Just to cite a few: gambling on baseball had gone on for over four decades; major league officials & players were well aware this & knew there was money in it if one chose to abandon scruples; from the beginning of the professionalization of baseball, owners had financially taken advantage of players; players organized revolts against this for a few seasons toward the end of the first decade of the century & as recently as 1915 & 1916 but were effectively crushed & brought to heel by the monopolistic owners’ power—money ruled the game & players held the short end of the stick; Sox owner Comiskey was among the worst in remunerating his players fairly; among shady players Gandil had been previously suspected & could be influential among certain teammates.

    Again, there is considerable semi-reliable-if-not-accurate evidence—through many people surrounding the Series betting and through personal contacts with the gamblers & involved players—that it was suspected that skullduggery very well could take place &, further, upon the start of the Series EVEN IF Jackson backed out of his initial acceptance of the (either $10 k or $20 k) take he had asked for if he was to become involved—Gandil-&-crew were determined to “earn” their share. Stein & others, again, amply cite meetings between Sox manager Gleason & owner Comiskey revealing they suspected hanky-panky was transpiring, & they had a good idea which of their players was involved. Thus, at that time and in these circumstances if Weaver had gone to Gleason or Comiskey with what he had overheard, it would likely at best have confirmed their suspicions; by this time the fixers were in the driver’s seat. Of course, no one can know for sure, but with all the smoke of suspicion already present & the committed intent of the fixers to carry out their dirty deed, what could anyone on the outside do? Even when NL president Heydler & AL president Johnson were informed after game one, they did not become involved. If skipper Gleason had benched those he suspected, he’d have only half his team to compete.

    Playing at less than one’s full ability is so easy to do, yet so difficult to detect for sure. A pitch here, a pitch there in potentially key situations, a less than best swing, a half step slow running the bases or making a fielding play, a slight bobble that costs a hit or a double play . . . the possibilities are endless for contributing to an intentional loss. Last night’s game two featured some situations that I believe were unfortunate, just part of the unpredictability of baseball, but if placed back in time to 1919 . . . ?

    And if one goes back to the period of roughly 1990 to 2005, how do we gauge those who clearly knew about steroid & PEDs use, and chose to indulge—or those around them who knew but didn’t blow the whistle on teammates? The comparisons between the decade of the 19-teens & ’90s-into-the-2000s can’t be made 1:1, but both involve “looking out for #1” & seeking monetary payoffs of one sort or another. You might say there were no real victims of the steroid era, but it cannot be denied that those players who remained clean were at a competitive disadvantage for the most part.

    So, where does all this leave us? Like you, Mark, I abhor cheating, and feel that cheaters must be some how punished. Yet, if I am not sure of all the facts & specific circumstances, how can I legitimately play judge, jury, & executioner? In hindsight, would it have been more just to suspend Buck Weaver for a season? Jackson getting a stiff fine & a suspension? Was it in any way fair for Gandil to skip off to sunny California from October 1919 on to live high on the hog, literally flaunting his ill-gotten gains? And, how about those who set up the big money behind the scandal? None of them, no one, was ever prosecuted much less indicted & punished. Gee, sounds kinda like our recent financial scandals where the little guys take it on the chin & the big boys walk . . . Ain’t America great?

    Like

Comments are encouraged.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: